Post by account_disabled on Nov 26, 2023 9:13:08 GMT
It can be stated unquestionably or with high probability that it was caused by factors harmful to health occurring in the work environment or due to the way work is performed, called "occupational exposure". Occupational disease is also regulated in the Act of October , on social insurance in respect of accidents at work and occupational diseases, in particular in the provision of Art. . In the light of Code, in order to recognize a disease as an occupational disease, the joint occurrence of two conditions is necessary.
Stating that it is a disease included in the list of occupational diseases and occurrence of occupational exposure within the meaning of this provision. The list of occupational diseases is included in the annex to the Regulation of the Council photo editing servies of Ministers of June , on occupational diseases. As a rule, it is unacceptable to diagnose an occupational disease outside this list. As rightly pointed out by the Supreme Court, when determining an occupational disease, only the effects of substances listed in applicable implementing acts issued under the authority of the provisions of the Labor Code may be taken into account.
And the catalog of occupational diseases cannot be expanded by inference from other generally applicable legal provisions judgment of the Supreme Court of April , , ref. no. file I PK . In turn, when it comes to diagnosing the occurrence of an occupational disease, in accordance with the provisions of Art. of the Labor Code An occupational disease may be diagnosed in an employee or former employee during the period of his or her employment in occupational exposure or after termination of work in such exposure, provided that documented symptoms of the disease occur within the period specified in the list of occupational diseases.
Stating that it is a disease included in the list of occupational diseases and occurrence of occupational exposure within the meaning of this provision. The list of occupational diseases is included in the annex to the Regulation of the Council photo editing servies of Ministers of June , on occupational diseases. As a rule, it is unacceptable to diagnose an occupational disease outside this list. As rightly pointed out by the Supreme Court, when determining an occupational disease, only the effects of substances listed in applicable implementing acts issued under the authority of the provisions of the Labor Code may be taken into account.
And the catalog of occupational diseases cannot be expanded by inference from other generally applicable legal provisions judgment of the Supreme Court of April , , ref. no. file I PK . In turn, when it comes to diagnosing the occurrence of an occupational disease, in accordance with the provisions of Art. of the Labor Code An occupational disease may be diagnosed in an employee or former employee during the period of his or her employment in occupational exposure or after termination of work in such exposure, provided that documented symptoms of the disease occur within the period specified in the list of occupational diseases.