Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 5:09:08 GMT
In addition, the joint child of the parties, Y., was born on 07.05.1999 and is at the age of perception. His opinion was consulted by the court, and he stated determinedly that he wanted to stay with his father. There are no serious reasons or evidence to suggest that his own wishes would be contrary to his best interest and that the father would not be able to fulfill his parental duties or neglect his obligations. to the father, it is not considered appropriate to make a written decision. Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd HD., 30.01.2013, 2012/8243 E., 2013/2307 K.
Little JD was born from the mother's extramarital France Telegram Number Data elationship, and his lineage with the father was established by recognition on 06.01.2012 (TMK art. 295). According to Article 337 of the Turkish Civil Code, the right of custody of a child born out of wedlock belongs to the mother. If the mother is young, restricted, dead, or has custody taken away from her, the judge appoints a guardian for the child or gives custody to the father, based on the child's best interests. In the current case, little JD's mother was born on 01.05.1996 and is a minor. Since the lineage with the father is established by recognition, the father has the right to receive custody. In addition, the joint child of the parties, Y., was born on 07.05.1999 and is at the age of perception. His opinion was consulted by the court, and he stated determinedly that he wanted to stay with his father.
There are no serious reasons or evidence to suggest that his own wishes would be contrary to his best interest and that the father would not be able to fulfill his parental duties or neglect his obligations. In this case, although custody should be given to the father, it is not considered appropriate to make a written decision. Supreme Court of Appeals 2JAccording to Article 337 of the Turkish Civil Code, the right of custody of a child born out of wedlock belongs to the mother. If the mother is young, restricted, dead, or has custody taken away from her, the judge appoints a guardian for the child or gives custody to the father, based on the child's best interests. In the current case, little JD's mother was born on 01.05.1996 and is a minor. Since the lineage with the father is established by recognition, the father has the right to receive custody.
Little JD was born from the mother's extramarital France Telegram Number Data elationship, and his lineage with the father was established by recognition on 06.01.2012 (TMK art. 295). According to Article 337 of the Turkish Civil Code, the right of custody of a child born out of wedlock belongs to the mother. If the mother is young, restricted, dead, or has custody taken away from her, the judge appoints a guardian for the child or gives custody to the father, based on the child's best interests. In the current case, little JD's mother was born on 01.05.1996 and is a minor. Since the lineage with the father is established by recognition, the father has the right to receive custody. In addition, the joint child of the parties, Y., was born on 07.05.1999 and is at the age of perception. His opinion was consulted by the court, and he stated determinedly that he wanted to stay with his father.
There are no serious reasons or evidence to suggest that his own wishes would be contrary to his best interest and that the father would not be able to fulfill his parental duties or neglect his obligations. In this case, although custody should be given to the father, it is not considered appropriate to make a written decision. Supreme Court of Appeals 2JAccording to Article 337 of the Turkish Civil Code, the right of custody of a child born out of wedlock belongs to the mother. If the mother is young, restricted, dead, or has custody taken away from her, the judge appoints a guardian for the child or gives custody to the father, based on the child's best interests. In the current case, little JD's mother was born on 01.05.1996 and is a minor. Since the lineage with the father is established by recognition, the father has the right to receive custody.